The crisis shows, that there is a lack of comprehensive management in companies; among other it is too limited to economic and technical factors. Because of increase in complexity and speed of endangering environmental challenges, among other things, the organization are faced with demographic and social changes, by changing the values, requirements and opinion of employees, with their emotional instability, and asking the fundamental existential questions to discover the deepest end of life. Spiritual awareness and way of life are becoming recognized as an essential human value, which not only ensures optimal exercise of their life roles, but also for personal and personal development. Spiritual intelligence and philosophy of running a business changes its meaning and purpose of business: removing constraints on the rational part of personality. An upgrade is the spiritual capital, and a recognition that it is the mission of higher (than just profits), and is the basis for achieving psychological wellbeing of employees, which supports creativity, innovation, and competitiveness of organizations. In this paper we focus on spiritual intelligence and spiritual capital, which is associated with psychological well-being of man, which comes from experience and optimum performance. Psychological well-being determinates two perspectives: hedonistic and eudemonic. Eudemonic approach that emphasizes self-realization, the researchers led to the psychological well-being and self-determination theories, i. Hedonistic approach such as people's own valuation being defined subjective welfare. Insight of both approaches combining psychological well-being of man that determines his satisfaction, creativity, success in work and productivity. This means that the expected (economic) organizations often results due to subjective well-being than vice versa. Leadership is often over looked.
COBISS.SI-ID: 10591004
The basis of each society consists of humans, being also essential parts of the concept of social responsibility (SR). SR is a contemporary version of informal systemic behavior aimed at requisite holism of behavior of influential persons and their organization. It requires their honest behavior, care, and end of abuse of their ownership rights in treatment of employees, business partners, broader society, and natural preconditions of humankind’s survival; in ISO 2600 the topics of SR are even 7 and linked by principles of holism and interdependence. SR extends to governors, managers, and governments the managerial principle called ‘process owners’ that entitles subordinates to run parts of organizations with responsibility including their right of (efficient and effective!) use without their right of abuse. Well-being of humans as persons, society, and employees may result from such non-technological innovation much more easily than without it. This is important because people with well-being feel and work better, thus contributing to the requisite holism and success.
COBISS.SI-ID: 10908188
One-sidedness is dangerous; it is also the main source of the current socio-economic crisis. The principles and methods of neoliberalism do not reveal any way out from the crisis because they have caused it. Social responsibility does indicate a way out, but as a complex non-technological innovation that opens the way from one-sidedness and the abuse of influence to the requisite holism with interdisciplinary creative co-operation. The financial, economic and social crisis that occurred in 2008 after several decades of being in the making also results from one-sidedness jeopardising relations and demanding holism, hence co-operation. All of us are interdependent and in need of innovations, but not just technological ones which are complex and complicated, but less so than innovations of values/culture/ethics/norms of holistic behaviour - e.g. for the transition from the limitations inside economics of a narrow specialisation to completing the latter with ethics of interdependence, and economics of creative co-operation aimed at the requisite holism. Social responsibility enables such attributes of humans and organisations, whereas neo-liberalism does not.
COBISS.SI-ID: 30736733