Monograph is the professional work of authors, Professor. Dr. Renato Vrenčur and prof. dr. Igor Pšundra. Prof. Dr. Vrenčur is conducting training for becoming real estate appraiser and he is an examiner with the Slovenian Institute of Auditors. The book is designed to not only for real estate assessors but also deals with topical issues in the practice of real estate.
F.18 Transfer of new know-how to direct users (seminars, fora, conferences)
COBISS.SI-ID: 263288064Članek navaja opažanja avtorja glede vprašanja uporabe prava EU v sodnih odločbah slovenskih sodišč. V prvem delu se opredeli do področij nacionalnega prava, na katerih se pravo EU uporabi, ter mestoma komentira ustreznost oz. določene značilnosti uporabe. Poudarek je dan tudi razlikovanju med neposredno in posredno uporabo prava EU. Opredeli se tudi do uporabe splošnih načel prava EU in do vpliva prava EU na nacionalno procesno pravo. Avtor zaključuje z ugotovitvijo, da se je število sodnih odločb z uporabo prava EU v zadnjih letih povečalo in da so slovenska sodišča, na splošno, na dobri poti sprejemanja mednarodnega in prava EU, tako kot samostojnega pravnega sistema, kot tudi sistema vpetega v vsako področje nacionalnega prava, oziroma da je treba na uporabo nacionalnega prava gledati skozi prizmo mednarodnega in prava EU.
F.18 Transfer of new know-how to direct users (seminars, fora, conferences)
COBISS.SI-ID: 4352299The article examines the question of unfounded payment notice for the amount from the independent bank guarantee. It discusses a situation when conditions from the bank guarantee are met and when bank should thus redeem the amount, but at the same time, it is established that the original legal transaction was not breached and the claimant's call on an independent bank guarantee has consequently been unfounded. The author defines the concept of misuse when calling on a bank guarantee, and rights and obligations of a guarantor's bank and of a guarantee in a case of unfounded payment notice. Also considered are autonomous rules on bank guarantee, mainly the UN Convention on independent guarantees and standby letters of credit, and rules from ZIZ on interim decisions.
F.24 Improvements to existing system-wide, normative and programme solutions, and methods
COBISS.SI-ID: 4496939This publication is the result of research of the section ‘Unexpected Circumstances’ within the Common Core of European Private Law Project (‘Trento Group’). The author was responsible for the part of the book discussing the applicable rules of Slovenian law.
D.06 Final report on a foreign/international project
COBISS.SI-ID: 4273451Prof. dr. Vesna Rijavec is a leader of EU project "Dimensions of Evidence in European Civil Procedure". The project is cofinanced by European Commission and is within special program Civil Justice. It is based on cooperation between 10 partner universities and more than 30 experts from all EU Member States. Within this project, the research group of Faculty of Law has under leadership of prof. Rijavec organised a number of international scientific conferences (project and conferences website: www.acj.si). The major objective of this project is to explore whether there exists a common core of European Law of Evidence (and taking evidence in particular), and if it does, to describe its content and its most important points of discord among the national legal systems. However, the aim is not only to compare the elements in the law of EU Member States, but to explore the actions of national courts to different situations (regarding the application of EU instruments or national law). By providing a clear picture of common core principles, the project can serve as a starting point for further harmonisation or unification processes in this field. A second major objective of this project is to contribute to the development of mutual trust among the national courts inside the EU as well as trust among policymakers in one Member State and national courts of other Member State, since such mutual trust is a basis for further development of the European Area of Justice and a prerequisite for further development of European Civil Procedure. A third major objective is to address the main issues and problems in the application of communication technology in evidence taking with special emphasis on videoconferencing in order to assist professionals with guidelines. A fourth major objective is to transfer the EU's existing good practices in taking evidence to Croatia as a new Member State of the European Union.
D.01 Chairing over/coordinating (international and national) projects