Loading...
Projects / Programmes source: ARIS

Privatizacija družbenih dejavnosti (Slovene)

Research activity

Code Science Field Subfield
5.03.00  Social sciences  Sociology   

Code Science Field
S210  Social sciences  Sociology 
Keywords
privatization, social services, quality of services , health services, labour market, social capital
Evaluation (rules)
source: COBISS
Researchers (7)
no. Code Name and surname Research area Role Period No. of publicationsNo. of publications
1.  08848  PhD Hajdeja Iglič  Sociology  Researcher  1999 - 2001 
2.  07712  PhD Anton Kramberger  Sociology  Researcher  1996 - 2001 
3.  06354  PhD Sonja Kump  Educational studies  Researcher  1996 - 2001 
4.  14641  PhD Mirna Macur  Sociology  Researcher  1996 - 2001 
5.  01103  PhD Andrej Rus  Sociology  Researcher  1996 - 2001 
6.  00388  PhD Veljko Rus  Sociology  Head  1998 - 2001  35 
7.  15320  PhD Boštjan Zalar  Sociology  Researcher  1996 - 2001 
Organisations (1)
no. Code Research organisation City Registration number No. of publicationsNo. of publications
1.  0582  University of Ljubljana, Faculty of Social Sciences  Ljubljana  1626957 
Abstract
This yearly report is a part of a five year study of privatization processes in the field of social services, i.e. education, health care, and social security. The main focus of the research is privatization (deregulation) of activities and not privatization of resources. This year we have conducted a survey based on interviews of health care providers (N=181) and users (N=450) at the level of primary medical services. The preliminary results of descriptive statistical analysis demonstrate positive influence of privatization on quality of health services. Surprisingly, such an improvement is not restricted only to private sector but has been also noticed in public sector (although to a 1ower degree). Preliminary results suggest that those doctors who have intention to move from public to private sector are professionally more active. It is also significant that those doctors who are already employed in private sector are also more profiled than their colleagues in public sector: they are more involved in profesional self-developement, more engaged in professional associations and willing to accept external control over their own work. And finally both, those in public and those in private sector, more frequentely express preference for cooperation between the two sectors than confrontation between them. It seems that ideological confrontation between private and public sectors is diminishing.
Views history
Favourite